![murus pro 1.3.6 mac pirate murus pro 1.3.6 mac pirate](https://i.imgur.com/E7lhwir.jpg)
![murus pro 1.3.6 mac pirate murus pro 1.3.6 mac pirate](https://lasopaclear767.weebly.com/uploads/1/2/6/5/126584350/308214181.png)
Intertextuality in Seneca’s Philosophical Writings will be of interest not only to those working on Seneca’s philosophical works, but also to anyone working on Latin literature and intertextuality in the ancient world. The volume, finally, features detailed discussion of the ways in which Seneca, the author of philosophical prose, puts forward his stance towards poetics and figures himself as a poet. They also provide a fresh interpretation of moral issues with particular application to the Roman worldview as fashioned by the mos maiorum. The studies analyzes the philosophy behind Seneca’s incorporating exact quotations from earlier tradition (including his criteria of selectivity) and Seneca’s interaction with ideas, trends and techniques from different sources, in order to elucidate his philosophical ideas and underscore his original contribution to the discussion of established philosophical traditions. Focusing on the Dialogues, the Naturales quaestiones, and the Moral Epistles, the volume includes multi-perspectival studies of Seneca’s interaction with all the great Latin epics (Lucretius, Vergil and Ovid), and discussions of how Seneca’s philosophical thought is informed by Hellenistic doxography, forensic rhetoric and declamation, the Homeric tradition, Euripidean tragedy and Greco-Roman mythology. It examines this interaction and engagement in his prose works, offering interpretative readings that are at once groundbreaking and stimulating to further study. This volume is the first systematic study of Seneca’s interaction with earlier literature of a variety of genres and traditions. Intertextuality in Seneca’s Philosophical Writings 15.270–336)Ģ Naturales quaestiones 3.20–1: effects of certain waters upon body and mindģ Naturales quaestiones 3.25–6: various mirabilia aquarum 49.6)ħ Sub auro servitus habitat: Seneca’s moralizing of architecture and the anti-Neronian querelleĨ Seneca on the mother cow: Poetic models and natural philosophy in the Consolation to Marciaġ Introduction: consoling, instructing, and rewritingĢ Animal sorrows across the genres: Lucretius and Ovidģ Stoicizing the cow: Seneca’s cosmology and philosophical anthropologyĩ Seneca on Pythagoras’ mirabilia aquarum (NQ 3.20–1, 25–6 Ovid Met. 49.12)Ħ The allusion to Aristo of Chios (Ep. 49.7)ĥ The final quotation: Euripides and Stoic rhetoric (Ep. 49.5)Ĥ The second quotation: Vergil, or the philosopher against the rest of the world (Ep. 33)Ħ The importance of collecting shells: Intertextuality in Seneca’s Epistle 49ģ The first quotation: Cicero against lyric poetry (Ep.
![murus pro 1.3.6 mac pirate murus pro 1.3.6 mac pirate](http://www.urban75.org/blog/images/comacchio-ferrera-italy-01.jpg)
Ĥ The structure and content of Seneca’s Libri moralis philosophiaeĥ Seneca quoting Ovid in the Epistulae moralesġ Philosophical sayings and the flocks of Polyphemus (Ep.
![murus pro 1.3.6 mac pirate murus pro 1.3.6 mac pirate](http://www.linder-partner.com/images/image/ea44/50_340.jpg)
1 Seneca on Augustus and Roman fatherhoodĥ Seneca’s example: practicing intertextuality as affiliationĢ Myth, poetry and Homer in Seneca philosophusĢ Theological criticism: rejection of Stoic allegoresisĪppendix: references to myth in Seneca philosophusġ The Letter Writer’s growing acceptance of theoretical philosophyĢ The Epistulae morales and the Outline of Stoic Ethics by Arius Didymus: the parallelsģ Doxography of ethics, references to the Libri moralis philosophiae, and the Letter Writer’s developing acceptance of.